I wouldn't do anything crazy. Try and sign Hunt with Mam's money and if that doesn't eventuate play Madden and Reynolds. Madden is pretty average but at least he'd have Reynolds beside him. Maybe we'd be less frantic too. If Reynolds goes down we're screwed no matter what combo they put out.
The Roosters boogeyman is garbage tbh. If the allegations are true it is a completely sackable offence and it'd be weak to not do so, and it is a poor contract we are free from.
If it was a mistake to not get rid of Haas back then, why would the club not get rid of Mam now? Better off starting now rather than repeating the same mistakes. And I don't think the club can use it as much of a turning point without firing him tbh (obviously dependent on the tests and...
The NRL does need to stop players from being picked up by other clubs but that should have zero bearing on whether we keep him or not. If the second test and the investigation turns out poorly for Mam I hope he is sacked.
Agree. I don't think Mam is worth the money, and I don't think he's the guy to take over after Reynolds, and a message has to be sent with a new start about to begin. This is a good opportunity and I hope the club seizes it, even better if we can get Hunt.
I definitely think they should. Addo-Carr won't be at the Dogs next year because of his incident, and he wasn't involved in a crash. It would show where both clubs are at right now if they don't. Time to make a point.