What is everyone who says Staggs to 5/8 seeing that I'm not?
The guy CAN'T PASS. Absolutely no idea how to set up his winger let alone organise a backline or set piece, also doubt his kicking ability.
This would be Hoffman 2.0
I'll bet if clubs could withhold a percentage of a players contract each year and pay it quarterly based on not doing stupid shit the behaviour would be exemplary.
Yes BUT the NRL have to back the clubs decision by putting rules in place so another club can't take advantage, otherwise what's in it for us.
It's a tricky situation the Broncos are in.
Ezra is a popular member of the squad so, if Madge the noted disciplinarian sacks him, it could cause massive...
Ezras Ranger struck the Uber, that much is clear and at this point undisputed.
The uber driver didn't have a drug in his/her system and charges aren't pending on the B sample for the Uber driver.
I really feel the public in general, including a lot of rusted on supporters are over this club.
He epitomises the general public's view of the team.
Blokes in this team have out of control egos that need pulling into line.
Time the NRL step in and put down some black and white penalties for this type of stuff.
Such as, if the club sacks him he can't play NRL for 2 years.
When it starts...
I'm talking about the 3rd man lurker, Yeo a lot, not involved in the tackle but joins in just before the attacker hits the ground.
If the attacker has made post contact metres that, to me at least, is he has won the ruck and the right to a fair play the ball.
The Penrith 3rd man has the right...
Not to mention even when the attacking player wins the ruck they are allowed to 3rd man flop dwell then peel off.
Often they hold the ball and ball carrying arm as well on the way up.
Other clubs need to push a bit harder to clarify what is winning the ruck and what isn't.
This interpretation...
Yes, all draft systems need the support of the players association to work.
No reason why Vlando can't negotiate this in the best interest if the comp.
Frankly, I'm surprised the bottom clubs haven't pushed for this a bit more.
It's a faster way for them to improve their rosters and challenge...
Thanks, it's a dumb rule IMO.
Technically the kicking team has done everything right the receiving team deliberately takes it out and gets a benefit.
Another rule that should be changed.
No not endorsements or direct payments. They were allowed to buy shares which is why the NRL couldn't stop it.
Wonder how many roosters players have investments in Nick's companies?