Search results

I don't recall that! 4 premierships in a decade, if anyone calls that underachieving, I'd be surpised.

Jumped 3 players? I don't think that's right. I'm assuming you mean Billy, Smoothy and Mozer? Smoothy has signed elsewhere, and Mozer is injured. So yeah, he's jumped 1, not 3.

Also, to be fair, a lot of those games were at the Tigers, where coaches go to die. I submit that when discussing coaching records, all Tigers years should be ignored 😉

Precisely when? No clue mate. Just when the discussions around here became about who replaces Kev if he is sacked, Maguire was my first thought. I'm not claiming to be connected or clever, it was just a logic thing. A) I didn't think they would try another rookie, and B) there was talk the...

To be fair, I predicted Madge, and I have no contacts LOL But yeah, in Buzz we trust

Oh well, Buzz said it, yeah ya got me :rofl

Because somehow in your strange world, a player getting injured is caused by a coaching mistake?

I wouldn't be shocked, nor worried, if Billy is in the 17 while Hunt is 6 and Mam's suspended. But I would be both of those if he is still there when Mam comes back.

It's been a full week without a BigPete 2025 team preview. I feel like a drug addict jonesing for a fix.

Totally loving the BigPete write-ups, but there's no such thing as too many Sproj lists ;) Anyone accuses you of that, well they are entitled to their very obviously wrong opinion

Yeah, but it's an IF.....the $150k at Manly was an offer he already had. There's no other way to interpret this, it was a bad move. He backed himself to get more, and it seems he was wrong.

Except he isn't. He has been in the NRL for 13 seasons and played 287 games. In half of those seasons, he has played every game. In all bar 3 seasons, he has exceeded 20 games. In each of the 3 seasons he fell under 20 games, the injuries were not ones that are recurring due to the body...

Of course he should, and he is. You are the only person who thinks he isn't.

Yeah definitely it's important, but you don't take the C away from a bloke just because he got an injury

So, in your world, prioritising your health to ensure you are at full fitness for the start of the actual season (you might know these as the games that matter), is a bad thing? And you think I have something to get over - yeah, right.

HAHAHAHAHA Nice try, but nobody's going to bite with that very low quality bait Also, 'resume' isn't the right word

It is nothing. You either didn't bother to read the article, or you are just being disingenuous. Here's a quote; "Luckily it wasn’t anything too serious, but the Broncos erred on the side of caution and sent Reynolds to undergo a minor clean-up procedure."

Of course it matters if it is shown they are not related. You claim you can't tell, well seemingly the police can, and they did not charge him with driving under the influence, so that is case closed on that matter. As for not getting why people are up in arms, the only group of people...

I hear ya @Gaz My comment that minor injuries shouldn’t double the penalty, actually wasn't an indication that I think that penalties / fines should reflect the extent or severity of injuries caused, it was just a reply to those people saying it justifies the difference in suspension between...

Who says I can't understand it? Just because you and I come to a different conclusion as to the appropriate outcome doesn't mean I don't understand something. I never said anything like he should not be suspended, or should only be a week or two. I'm actually pretty happy with 9 weeks viewed...