Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 2885059, member: 9052"] To me the issue is the value these awards hold when defining champion players ie when looking back at JT they'll be sure to mention the Dally Ms, Clive Churchills, premierships, origins, test matches, etc. Just like every other facet of the NRL there must be theatre involved... and there always appears to be fingers in the pot to manufacture a result. One of the things I noticed was the amount of players receiving votes despite being on the losing side. It's like the standard voting must be 3 influential player on the winning team 2 someone from losing team (at worst a high profile player 1 player from winning team There was one game I happened to see the voting for and despite the losing team getting comprehensively beaten one of their players got 2 points. And I remembered thinking there was no way he was the second best player on the field. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)