Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 2903246, member: 8423"] [USER=8290]@Unbreakable[/USER], these are from the last three pages. It is hard to determine whether a couple of those are positive or negative. Not really sure where anyone has said that he is 'unbelievably good'. What does seem to be clear is that those defending him are not saying he is 'unbelievably good' but rather that he is very good value for money. Some even acknowledging that before the back end of last year, he wasn't going that well, seems a pretty reasonable point of view to me. It also seems that the comments you are referring to only started to really surface in response to [USER=9102]@Kyall[/USER] doing his usual thing and suggesting an unproven youngster replace a 200 game veteran. I'm still not really sure where you are getting your hyperbole from? Do I need to go back further pages? Because I really don't see where this 'blasphemy to even question his contributions' is coming from and how in light of these quotes it isn't clearly hyperbole on your part? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 189 (members: 0, guests: 189)