Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lockysillegitimatechild, post: 2993652, member: 8814"] That's correct, but I think that may be more a salary cap tactical play. Outside of this it just doesn't make sense. Turpin showed he is a more then adequate back up if needed in his limited time last year. Seibold and the coaching staff may be gambling on mccullough not getting injured for the first half of the season so they can bring in a minimum salary player over Turpin who may have cost a little more to lure from Melbourne. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 235 (members: 0, guests: 235)