Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Fitzy, post: 3455537, member: 9881"] Quite literally as our starting hooker he could have asked for figures that are worthwhile being reported in the papers. It’s not the case cause he’s on **** all. Anything upwards to 300k is very reasonable for Billy considering nobody else exists on the market, utility value makes a player more expensive and his performances this year were well and truely at a standard to ask for that. He highly likely is on less. So quit your whining cause point being is his value in terms of salary cap is well under the average wage and his output is immense for the amount he is on. He literally is a Moneyball player. Obviously when you have a salary cap it’s not ideal to be coming 9th and needing a Moneyball player but that is the situation we are in and as such he plays a perfect role for this team. Does anyone think he is amazing? No. We purely are just being realistic with our situation. Obviously anyone who is remotely better than him that we acquire or have in the future kicks him back to reserve grade and probably unless proving to be handy depth will be moved on at the end of the 2 years but at the minute he is the starting hooker and proved far more than alternate options so can you explain to me how on earth that anything regarding Billy and contracts over the last 14-15 months or whenever he was signed has been unjustified and or nepotistic? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 243 (members: 0, guests: 243)