Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 3455749, member: 8215"] Or, the more likely scenario that our "top-line" halves were dogshit, and rightly shown the door, the halves that remained to partner Reynolds were an unknown (TMM) or injury-prone fringe first-graders, and our hookers were not much better. In the case of hooker, we at least have a very promising young player coming through, and supposedly little in the way of spare cap space to spend, so a dependable, cheap, loyal, and hard-working utility would make sense. There are zero reports of rumours that he is on anything much above minimum wage, he is a low-maintenance, club-focused player, and will play wherever he is asked, and will give his all in that position. You're trying to make this a negative, citing nepotism, because (well who fucking knows), when in reality, we have a player here who is willing to bleed for the coach and club and push his limited talents as far as possible, which is far more than you'd be able to expect from a stocko journeyman. Does that leave us a top-line hooker or half short until Mozer is ready? Maybe, but the question remains on who we could have legitimately targeted, who would have been a realistic chance, and who would have suited what we needed? The options look pretty barren. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 236 (members: 0, guests: 236)