Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="the_next, post: 3528177, member: 9614"] Guilty until proven innocent here I think, unfortunately. Originally I thought Reece may be able to get off with saying that it was directed at a player but the Fox footage does everything to say it was directed at the ref. Is the ref called on for evidence as part of it? If so and he cannot 100% be confident that it was directed at him, what happens? Is that enough doubt to just dish out a fine? I still maintain that if the ref thought it was directed at him, he would have sent him rather than give them 10m. As long as it’s not more than 2wks, it may not be the worst thing for Walsh, so long as he learns from it. It’ll be a hard one to take, missing out on origin 3 and the extra $$ he would have pocketed also. At least sailor looks ready, hopefully it doesn’t derail our season. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 19 (members: 0, guests: 19)