Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 3529262, member: 8423"] I have no doubt he swore at the ref and regardless of the absolutely awful hearing that did not even come close to proving what it was supposed to do at no surprise to anyone, I think a suspension is a good outcome because as much as referees are awful, like everyone else, they deserve respect. What is frustrating as always though is the double standard flashing in neon lights when looking at what Luai did. Luai has a believable excuse like Walsh did but the evidence was also there for all to see in that he pushed an official, which is either equal or worse than swearing at them. Luai is also in he ref’s face game in, game out so why no suspension there? If Walsh’s conduct is worth three weeks, and I’m not saying it shouldn’t be, Luai’s is worth that as well because ultimately, both cases are contrary conduct toward a referee. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 284 (members: 0, guests: 284)