Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 3578625, member: 9052"] I'd assume the 3yr contract for Capewell is including 2024, which would mean they're actually offering a 2yr deal and want him to get released for next year... realistically they're not allowed to offer anything for his contracted years, but that doesnt seem to matter at this point. Looking at it that way it might be all about the 2nd year that warriors are offering, whereas we might be saying let's take it year by year. The frustrating part of it all is that we definitely need Capewell this year as our edge depth is non-existent but we may not need him for 2025 onwards... outside of offering great depth. The warriors offer may hinge on getting him next year as well, knowing that this year and next might be the last peak years for Capewell and they want to get their money's worth out of the deal. Its frustrating to me, because it's putting pressure on us to release him when they're shouldn't be any, because he's under contract... all the media pressure nowadays to release a player as soon as they've signed elsewhere is shit. I'd be fine if Capewell served out his last year and then moved onto his warriors deal, but will it actually play out that way [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 86 (members: 0, guests: 86)