Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3163507, member: 1992"] That's almost exactly what I said! Had you read my post right through I stated that could he 'guarantee he would try to keep to the rules' would be the most you could hope for. You and I weren't there and how do you know his response wasn't taken out of context? Why be outraged by a newspaper/media report which you know are unreliable and sensationalist? Had I heard it myself I could decide my level of indignation but you guys keep falling for the same old trick. No wonder the media keep playing it on you. Unlike you guys I take these kind of things with a grain of salt but jesus, some of you simply swallow everything as if it's the sworn, proven gospel truth. We weren't there, we didn't hear him say it, we're getting it second and third hand, it's anecdotal evidence and I don't blame TPJ for being angry that private discussion was blabbed to the media. Have you ever considered TPJ might be angry because THAT'S NOT HOW IT WENT DOWN???? That it's been misrepresented? Save the outrage until you KNOW with certainty. This sort of mentality results in the gullible screaming 'ban him for life' for the same offence as WB who may have stepped out for dinner with the missus more than once too, not that we know that happened, it's just possible. TPJ might just have been silly enough to think being honest was the best policy in this instance. Clearly few of you think things through. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)