Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kan Huang, post: 2106175, member: 7749"] I'm not even sure what your first line means Lachy. [icon_lol1. The Cats still had a deficient forward line as did the Eagles in their Premiership years yet were still able to win the competition. Sydney being an exception with one of the best forward lines in the competition still won it based on some great defence in the final quarter in 2005. You've definitely gotta be very even across the board for the team but to have a stingy defence is often the greatest asset a team can have as the contributions in goals can come across the midfield and forward line in tandem. That's why when I look at the Hawks team, they're still relatively inexperienced and have proven that they have difficulty in stopping potent forward lines much like the Dogs who don't even bother playing tall at all besides Minson who sits up in the goal square. Their key target is Johnson and he absolutely carves! The best defence can play on both talls and smalls and I just think that the Hawks have issues when trying to reduce the amount of inside 50's and the efficiency of powerful forward lines. Their midfield is classy as well but I think still has question marks over their potential in playing pressure games - they still have plenty of hoodoo's to break against the top teams in the league. icon_thumbs_u [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 336 (members: 0, guests: 336)