Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="broncos4life, post: 3170929, member: 7802"] Yep, it was not only slanderous but it makes no fucking sense. Kent claims that we did this because he was talking to the integrity unit and wanted to make sure he wouldn't 'dob them in', so they have fined him more than 100k and made it so he can't sneeze out of place for risk of losing his whole contract. If there was any basis to Kent's claims they would be wanting to keep him as happy as possible, not fining him and publicly stating what thin ice he is on. Not only is it nonsensical it just highlights how the media can say absolutely anything they want with no recourse. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 20 (members: 0, guests: 20)