Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Wolfie, post: 3004303, member: 8770"] Salary cap or not, they would still have the same expectations. It wouldnt change a thing. I must admit i did word my statement wrongly, it shouldnt have said supposed, i really should have said expected. I'm not quite sure you get it with those clubs i mentioned. Go onto a Man United message board, or a Real Madrid message boards and ask on there if they think not being title contenders is good enough. They expect to be right in there every season challenging. Last year i would actually say was an inconsistent year anyway, not a mediocre one. If we were mediocre, wouldn't that mean we would have finished way lower than sixth and more than two points behind the top 2? I'd say the definition of mediocre last year was the Tigers, Raiders and Knights. Being thrashed in one game doesnt make the whole year mediocre, it just means we collapsed in one certain game. You would have a point if it happened every week. A mediocre year for Seibold shouldnt be tolerated. If we are mediocre with our roster then Seibold should get sacked. I can handle us being inconsistent, thats not the same as mediocrity. We have a lot of younger guys, so i expect inconsistency to a point. Barring injury, i expect us to do better than achieving the 32 points we got this last year. We have Gillett back, we have an excellent group of forwards, We have better depth in the halves, Roberts and Bird hopefully will be a lot fitter and our younger guys from last year will be a bit smarter. The more i think about it, i'd actually say, unless we have any major injuries, anything less than surpassing the 2018 target should be judged as failure. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now