Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bazza, post: 2779192, member: 8440"] So by that logic, your saying we got physically dominated by the Cowboys, as well as most other teams during the year, purely because we were more fatigued than our opponents? I think the Sharks pack took it to the Cowboys pack and had players who could match it physically with the Cowboys pack. We didn't. The Sharks were able to cut down their yardage game. We couldn't. The Sharks made metres out of their end. We didn't Against the Sharks, the Cowboys got fatigued because of their own wrongdoing. You can't just go into a match, were the opposition is physically bigger than you and hope that they make plenty of unforced error. Your not always going to be presented the opportunities the Sharks were awarded. You can't just hope that they get fatigued to be able to win. You have to have players who can match it with the bigger teams and not get dominated on a regular basis the way our pack does. We have no one big enough to be able stand up to the other forward packs in the comp. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 193 (members: 0, guests: 193)