Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="m1c, post: 2406947, member: 1944"] Hilfy was shafted by Ponting and Neilson. He's an attacking bowler who took bags of wickets in domestic cricket through pitching up the swinging rock. They negated his strength and used him as a line and length stock bowler. I'm a huge advocate of Copeland. I loved Stu Clark (90 odd wickets @ 23) as a bowler and he's cut from the same wily cloth. Clark had untimely injuries however his treatment at the hands of the hierarchy was disgraceful. To discard a man of his record in our barren times is inexcusable. I find the lacklustre speed an asset. Batsmen are forced to make their own pace which is a risk in itself given the good areas he can maintain. As you say Coxy, Copeland has the ball on a string and can move it at will. Also love that he didn't come through the system at a time when it has produced flawed produce. He's completed a long apprenticeship at grade and state level, advancing only because he figured out how to dismiss batsman. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 25 (members: 0, guests: 25)