Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 3692265, member: 8272"] They should never have used the snicko, it wasn't needed, and it just confused the situation. There was conclusive proof with the deviation, they don't have to check every bit of technology if the eye test passes then they can stop there. Players and public seem to think everything has to show out to be out. With the hitting the stumps, 50% of the ball was hitting leg stump but 50% was not below the line of the top of the stumps. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 57 (members: 0, guests: 57)