Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 2921620, member: 8423"] So it is pretty funny really, in a pathetic way. Three guys need to be dropped (two should probably have never been there in the first place) in Bancroft, Khawaja and S.Marsh but thanks to the stupidity of the Australian team, two of those guys now have to play. So: 1. Renshaw - Should be there anyway 2. Burns - Not really a step down on what Warner has been offering, DEFINITELY better than Bancroft 3. Khawaja - Should be dropped, horrible outside Australia 4. Bailey / Handscomb / Clarke - Probably should be Handscomb out of the three, really should be Maxwell but if you finally get rid of one idiot in Warner, do you want another divisive character bought in? At least you know he has the ability to win a game off his own bat, something neither Bailey or Handscomb are capable of and Clarke is well and truly past it 5. S.Marsh - Should be dropped, had a good Ashes series against a pop gun attack, should never have been picked in the first place 6. M.Marsh - He hasn't been going great BUT a heck of a lot better than anyone else in the top six and deserves to retain his spot 7. Paine (c) - The surprise packet really, he shouldn't have been picked for the Ashes but he has been an absolute shining light since his selection, good on him, handled a difficult role being pitch-forked in on the back of horrible circumstances 8. Cummins - Could be the smokey captain but hopefully not, great player and hopefully not involved with the ball-tampering rubbish 9. Richardson / Sayers - Starc is apparently in heavy doubt due to injury and why not give one of these two a shot, Starc has been pretty ineffective the last two tests anyway, he is apparently very, very unhappy about Smith using the 'leadership group' as being behind the ball thing, he is not happy at all, may want to play still to prove a point 10. Lyon - This is an interesting one, he obviously deserves to be there but given his seniority in the side, hopefully he wasn't involved in the ball-tampering rubbish, if he was, not sure who comes in 11. Hazlewood - Apparently filthy that his name has been dragged through the mud due to being part of the 'leadership group' at least in the past, hopefully he wasn't involved and comes out with a point to prove [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now