Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 2993449, member: 8272"] No, my problem with old mate's poor article is still the same he omitted facts to suit his agenda. So you don't think the current Test opener batting in the only warm up game and getting 162 like Marsh did would have got him the spot- it completely eliminates the he hasn't batted enough reason. Australia 4/494 if Renshaw has a piece of that no way does he not play the Test. Holland played because of his 5 in that game, Labuschagne made his debut. Concussion cost him his Test spot, and if he had played that game and batted in Australia's only innings he would have played the Test six days later- so that writer angling at some mystery selection snub just isn't true. To say he muck up his prep is just so untrue it's not funny. He had five SS games and he is averaging 19. Harris had the same five games and he scored runs. I am all for sticking up for Bulls but no way is it right to blame some mystery AC conspiracy theory. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)