Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 3209150, member: 8272"] I don't think I am being silly at all, I am just pointing out Australia just did the same thing. Don't you have to look at all cases if you're going to amended the rule? Couldn't Australia be exploiting the rule to get a fresh fielder out there? Not sure what you have been reading but I think it's now 10023 times I have given my opinion it's either sub everyone or sub no one you can't pick certain players that can be replaced- that's my opinion. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 13 (members: 0, guests: 13)