Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion
Other Sports Discussion
Australian Open thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Flutterby, post: 2176636, member: 1853"] I'm pretty sure if they went to best of 5 for women (as I also think they should) you wouldn't see such one-sided straight sets wins as often. But to the original point of why the men and women get the same prizemoney, well it's all to do with how much money they bring in to the tournament not how much time they spend on court and now both the mens and the womens side get the same amount from sponsors. Kia is the overall event sponsor, GE Money sponsors the men's side and Garnier sponsors the women's side (though they don't publicly state it like that). Both GE Money and Garnier pay the exact same amount of money - therefore the men and women are bringing in the same income, therefore they deserve an equal share of the profits (to put it in business terms). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
General Discussion
Other Sports Discussion
Australian Open thread
Top