Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3099974, member: 1992"] More? Yes, it was full of speculation but that's not the point is it? You don't say, if 'it's true' or 'if that's the facts' then etc etc. Nope, you write as though it was fact. You seem to jump from saying something is very likely pure speculation and end up with Boyd dropped. That's you working something up out of nothing...the very thing everyone on here condemns journalists for. You slagged him off without merit. Agendas see? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 35 (members: 0, guests: 35)