Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="subsbligh, post: 2461890, member: 1950"] It's no different to a not for profit organisation. Unlike any other corporation, it's not the NRL's primary purpose to maximise shareholder wealth. You need a bit of both - business savy and a love of and understandings of the the game and its roots. I'd much prefer those portions to be roughly 90%/10% as a purely econnomically rational businessman is not always going to make the right decision for all stakeholders. Just as the traditional "by the book" black and white lawyer (Gallop) struggled to show initiative. But a Rugby League purist (say a Gus Gould for example) would be a hopeless CEO. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)