Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2768159, member: 8215"] What can't Hunt "organise"? What makes an organiser? I'd actually like to know what people's opinions are on this? Are you talking about moving the forwards around for field position? That would be shared between the halfback and the hooker I would argue, and yes, we often lack field position, but that's arguably down to our defence conceding metres, not necessarily ours being unable to. Is it scoring points once we have field position? Because I would dare say we're at the top of the tree when it comes to points scored vs number of plays in the opposition 20. We seem to make the most of the field position we have. Or lastly, are you talking about organising the last tackle plays? Overall yes, this is where his weakness is, being kick selection, kick vs run options, etc. But again, with a healthy pack (which is what has been afforded teams like the Cowboys, the Sharks, the Dogs, the Storm), that side of his game looked much better. Thurston, being the dominant half, the organiser, arguably the best go-to player in the world when it comes to scoring points, was not able to drag his side back from 3 tries down with half an hour to go against the team running second last. The one try that was scored was via Michael Morgan to a back-rower, hardly enterprising stuff. Simply because the Cowboys were fatigued and were missing their hooker. We've been missing the majority of our starting forward pack for the duration of our slump, but the moment we get close to a full squad we're 2 for 2 and Hunt has looked very comfortable. What we have here is an agenda-driven scapegoat. This thread wouldn't even exist had we not been so fucked over with injuries and had Big Pete not decided to (by his own admission) prematurely force the point because of a known agenda out there. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now