Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="McHunt, post: 3304252, member: 9853"] No, I'm saying the opposite of that. A quick ring around confirms the rumour is rife, you tender it as a rumour, with the source withheld. When someone goes on record, you are reporting what they are saying. The burden of proof is on them. I'm explaining how the media works. If any of this is shocking to you, you're a bit sheltered. The underlying premise in all this is that Badel is "lying for the clicks." I'm saying that's bullshit, and I've explained why it's bullshit. I reckon you should put you should try the experiment and see how you go betting against Badel being right. My casual observation here is generally that's a losing bet. You're just ranting again under the premise that Badel is wrong constantly. He's not. You're wrong constantly. Prove me wrong. As for "click bait" really what the **** are you talking about? That more describes BHQ than the Courier Mail. Except the dick enlargement ads. That shit is cash. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 229 (members: 0, guests: 229)