Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Thelmus, post: 3138088, member: 8988"] I'd agree for the most of that except if you look at the 1, 6, 7, 9 and 13, 3 are playing regular first grade, and the other 2 are permanent fixtures in our side. One of them continues in the same role. Contrary to any perception, there is no reason to play a player on a high contract. If the coach doesn't have that power, he shouldn't be coach and the people that appointed him shouldn't have their jobs. There has never been a successful sporting organisation whose coach was micromanaged. The only say the board should have in a coach's conduct is whether he continues as coach and that decision should happen at season's end. That said if there are irresistible differences between players and coaching staff, that can expedite things. But that is something only club insiders should know. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)