Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ghibli, post: 2194268, member: 1856"] Paul is a deadset **** muncher! For him to be carrying on like that at the ref after the game is a real blight on the competition. Especially when the "Rep Coach" doesn't know how to interpret rules depending on the context! Straight from the Official rule book champ: Section 4 - Note: [b]The referee should consider advantage play prior to penalising[/b]. Penalties [u]may[/u] be awarded at the point of the infringement in the following circumstances:- [i]In the context of the event in question, Subsection 9[/i] 9. A defending player, must in the refereeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s opinion, be attempting to remove a tag and not deliberately impeding the progress of the ball carrier or any attacking player with their body. If an attacking playerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s progress is impeded, with or without the ball, a penalty [u]may[/u] be awarded. The bloke is an idtiot, carrying on stating that Oztag is a non-contact sport, and that ANY contact MUST be immediately penalised. He even thinks penalties must be awarded even when the defender (him) is the person to be penalised, and the play has gone 5 meters beyond him, and the player with the ball is on his way to an unchecked try line - PAUL YOU **** HEAD, IT'S ADVANTAGE PLAYED. No worries Paul, let the ref blow a penalty, stop our player scoring a certain try, bring it back to the point of your infringement, let your team set their defensive line **** HEAD. Yes, the intent of Oztag is 'Non-Contact', that doesn't mean that contact won't occur, if it does, a penalty [u]may[/u] be awarded (depending in the context of the incident). Then for another player in their team (who is also a ref for this comp) to say to me "I've got your number mate", well good on you tosser! What difference will that make? If you referee me in a biased or prejudiced manner in the future, I'll report you to Troy and explain the full story. To be honest, I feel for that ref tonight, he's a great ref (the older bloke), sure he may not keep up with the play - especially if there's a break - but he doesn't miss much, and lets the games flow well. For him to be copping constant mouthing off at every decision that the other team doesn't agree with (during and after the game), must've been really annoying. In relation to the bloke that smashed Luke, well that's Hammo's "friend" who sent him off and current ref - pretty low form. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 328 (members: 0, guests: 328)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now