Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Fitzy, post: 3583905, member: 9881"] Definitely not a to rave about t20 batsman. His game is built around classical strokes and top technique. Pretty sure he averaged up towards 30 not bad for a bloke who is not even remotely an aggressive oriented batsman. Great fielder and handy bowler sure in a team like today when batting class is low he isn’t going to be overly valuable but when you got the star players like your Munro’s, Billings, Khawaja’s he acts as good balance and an accumulator. But when those blokes are out regardless of whether he was in the team before or not when they are gone he will be in the side regardless so not really a problem the heat can fix. All of a sudden today instead of being an accumulator he had to become a star player and when your 1 off a fair few you do stupid shit. I agree, I doubt there is a future where Nathan McSweeney is a top quality batsman at t20 level. But when you lose your 4 biggest stature batters and your bowling lineup is star studded there is only so many more players who can be match winners. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)