Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Maddy1to9, post: 2948948, member: 9441"] I for one reckon that lot of criticism is being aimed at Boyd is maybe he's not motivating the team enough with his own performance (?), having a 'C' next to his name at the Broncos and not being like one(?) or lack of genuine 7 and that burden falling on entire team? I reckon it's more that we don't have a proper 7. We've a big flaw in our team (no proper 7) that no one in the management admits openly and do something about is something that bothers me a lot. I could be wrong and right but it all comes down to the individual players as to what performance they are putting in week in week out. I am in work place where my job is guaranteed as long as I perform everyday without any set backs. ( I do have some set backs but, I am clever enough over come them by working hard & not repeating them). I see people being shown the door if they are non-performing for more than a week. How come the guys in the team keep their place in the side with their poor performance every game is beyond crazy to me. Nothing more than Milford performing every week excites me but, he has been playing no better than a park footballer to me & to top it off, he's being paid over $1M a season. Are we really getting any worth the money being spent on him? As for KNick, he don't deserve to be on the field for no more than 20min max as an interchange role. The role he played in 2015 will suit him perfectly. Having waited for 2 weeks (like everyone else) for a Broncos game, I couldn't be more excited on Sunday for the Storm game and boy, I did enjoy the 1st half so very much but to witness the 2nd half was so painful. I don't give a shit about any of our opposition teams but I simply can't take a Broncos loss. It looks like we've to deal with 3 opponents on every game day (team we play against + Media + Reffs). It's a monumental task to defy the odds & win against all 3 week in week out. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 37 (members: 0, guests: 37)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now