Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="theshed, post: 3027294, member: 2290"] No semantics is exactly what it is. My opinion was that I felt as if Boyd’s contract was made with more heart than brain. You got bogged down in the wording of it to try and act like it was an attack at Bennett which it wasn’t specifically. So you’ve just double downed on telling me what it is that I meant based on the exact definition of the words I chose. Well, this is a forum about footy and not a legal document. So I’m allowed to clarify what I actually meant and not be told by you what I meant. Maybe it was Bennett, maybe it was Lockyer, maybe it was White, or another person or maybe it was a unanimous decision from every single official and player at the club. I don’t care. I just FEEL as though Boyd’s contract wasn’t a very rational decision. And anybody who reads my original post without trying their best to make it about it seem like a dig aimed at Bennett would interpret it that way. Then you looked like an idiot for being presumptuous and so you’ve had to commit all these posts trying to hang me based on the word “someone” and the word “his”. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 18 (members: 0, guests: 18)