Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="theshed, post: 3027405, member: 2290"] [LEFT][SIZE=14px][COLOR=rgb(252, 252, 255)] [/COLOR][/SIZE][/LEFT] I'd prefer to agree that " [B]I find it really hard to see it as anything other than someone looking out for a mate rather than a rational decision."[/B] and "[B]I just FEEL as though Boyd’s contract wasn’t a very rational decision."[/B] is essentially the exact same phrase if you don't focus on semantics to a childish degree. Then we can move on to also agree with your comment here: [LEFT][SIZE=14px][COLOR=rgb(252, 252, 255)] [/COLOR] [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#000000]So yeah, lets agree that had you actually read what I wrote instead of trying to find some anti-Bennett agenda where there wasn't one (at least not specifically anti-Bennett), that there would not have been this discussion. Lets agree that if you weren't such a petty person who's only contribution to this forum is to try and catch people out for having a relaxed approach to grammar it wouldn't be so embarrassing when you cant even live up to the pointlessly high standards you have made it your mission to uphold. [/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#000000]You can call it whatever you want, I'm not trying to win the internet. I couldn't care less who you or other posters deem as the winner. I just think your a bit of a sad person and often drag the board down into petty arguments because you think you're smarter than you are.[/COLOR][/FONT] [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#000000]I apologise to other posters on here for filling the thread with this shit. I usually avoid it, and I wont co[/COLOR][/FONT][COLOR=#000000][FONT=Verdana]ntinue any further but I just wanted to address Huge's pattern of low quality posting. [/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE] [FONT=Verdana][COLOR=#007600]edit: formatting [/COLOR][/FONT][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 132 (members: 0, guests: 132)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now