Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 3064782, member: 9052"] But I don't see why the NRL would want clubs to wear a nonexistent salary. If the player decides to walk away from $1M it is effectively not being paid anymore by anyone so why would the NRL say nah you have to keep that $1m in the cap. It doesnt benefit anyone... the player isn't getting the money, the club isn't spending the money (just wearing it on the cap) and the NRL has to keep track of it as part of the salary cap auditing (lord knows they struggle bad enough as it is, but now they want to manage money that isn't even being spent). If anything the Jarryd Hayne example suggests that players and clubs can mutually void a contract and may have been able to do this all along in order to keep player transfers fluid within the league. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)