Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 2893306, member: 8272"] The fact he has never played makes no difference, do you want a State Coroner that's murdered people too? How can he possibly have findings if he's never done it? The State Coroner for New South Wales never played Test cricket so he can't possibly investigate the death of Hughes? His role is to make findings that could stop this happening again. Like the Phillip Hughes inquest where he looked at equipment, reaction time of medical people, SCG facilities and short balls bowled that day. It's one quote and they've sucked it in with a headline, of course he would have looked at training and further education. Molo did it twice after the accident. If someone died at any work and then you kept doing it do you think people would question training? He also made findings about send offs and possible rules/actions that could be implemented. It's not about blame in this case he hasn't recommended any charges. It's about it not happening again. If he finds some things that can be done better or quicker than you do them. Helmets changed because of the Hughes' findings. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 125 (members: 0, guests: 125)