Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3090426, member: 1992"] You may be right about the defence. How about this for consideration then. When Boyd was out back Milford and co were letting a fair bit through with poor tackling and reading so Boyd had a lot to organise and contend with. When Boyd swapped he was first contact, up front and putting his body 'on the line'. No one could fairly say he didn't commit in defence and therefore Milford had LESS to contend with and fewer occasions on which to look ordinary. It's just worth considering. I'm not saying Boyd did well but I do think the swap improved the midfield defence but not the attack. I don't believe Milford was much of an improvement over Boyd defensively as a fullback but I could easily be wrong about that. I do agree Boyd needs improvement but he seems the focus and the vitriolic (not yours!) comments far too much. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)