Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kimlo, post: 3292346, member: 2021"] While I don't agree with his tone I 100% agree with his argument. It's conspiracy theory madness that a coach leaves a place worse off intentionally as some sort of evil master plan. Let's all thank Seibold for the place being better off than last year, he obviously setup the foundations for a claim up the ladder. Oftan the simplest explanation is the correct one. Searching for all these crazy theories like him being a master manipulator who sets up clubs to fail the second he leaves is just crazy theories not based in reality. The reality is, he is often replaced by worse coaches so the joints go down. I know a business that made 20k a week, they leased it out for 8k a week, within 12 months the people leasing it had profits shrink to below 5k a week. Within 2 years they had to break lease or face bankruptcy. The original owners took the place back and within 12 months profits were over 20k a week again, after 2 years, they would regularly make 30k a week net profit. Coaching is a tough gig, very few coaches make it past 5-10 years, statistically anyone who replaces Bennett (or Bellamy/Robinson when the time comes) will almost certainly fail. That's just probability. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 63 (members: 0, guests: 63)