Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3163377, member: 1992"] I think too many of us on here thought we were making a big time signing but truthfully we were only adding to our depth. I'm of the opinion that the growing perception that Milford just will never be a good halfback/five eight meant we were light on in those positions. Signing Croft was a relatively cheap addition to inventory and to an extent, a future proofing. I don't think upper management ever considered him a saviour as so many on here did. I believe they believe as I do, that Croft is still early in the maturing process. With SOS injured, Dearden so young and without ISC to get game time, KNik gone and Milford plainly terrible signing a young backup cheaply was a great move. It's our fault for thinking he was bought to be a premium halfback, he wasn't. It was an opportunistic value pick. In time I think it will be shown to be an excellent decision and in two years time I believe this season will be the adversity that builds his character. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 300 (members: 0, guests: 300)