Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3163401, member: 1992"] No, I don't think that's how it went down. I think signing Croft was simply an opportunistic event. He was signed because he was young, had some nrl experience, was cheap and available, and lastly we were thin in that area. He was never signed to be our saviour. He was also signed because Milford had/has been a miserable failure in the halves. Why are you trying to attach a single reason to the signing when it's abundantly clear there were multiple considerations? Is it because a single reason is easier to attack? Croft is an easy target but he's the least of the Broncos problems. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 285 (members: 0, guests: 285)