Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="McHunt, post: 3394796, member: 9853"] Okay, enough of this bullshit. 1. This story should never have been posted as "news." It was only ever worth a couple of lines and some quotes inserted in the Rumours thread. If you've noticed, that's what I've been doing. 2. It was very obviously a prediction, not a reporting of fact. Predictions can be right, wrong or anywhere in between. But they can not be lies. The problem in this thread is reading comprehension, and also that the OP presented it as news, not an editorial prediction. 3. If you're relying on publishers - such as News - to turn a blind eye to you blatantly thieving their copyright, and rubbing it in by recycling their headlines - at least do them the courtesy of not defaming and smearing the authors within the article. And attacking the author in the title is beyond the pale. I was under the impression we were trying to fly under the radar with this so the site would not be sued into shutting down. I have gone to great lengths to avoid what you are doing here. 4. Finally, you blokes are mods. You should know better than to be carrying on with this charade. It's only trolling. Fine that you're getting this toxic discussion going to "attract eyeballs" but please don't get the site taken down by getting cocky over us stealing other people's work. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 70 (members: 0, guests: 70)