Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Porthoz, post: 2796065, member: 2221"] I explained what my interpretation of a good kick is for clarity, not to justify my existing stance. Hunt's (and Milford's) attacking kicks ability is there for everyone with a functioning set of eyes to confirm. If you disagree with my assessment of good, feel free to explain why. Btw, who is everyone? This thread is actually very quiet, with the silence of otherwise very vocal "Hunt lovers" really telling it all. There are approximately 100 short kicks [B]in attacking position[/B] to judge from, and you want to argue that we didn't have field position... for what purpose? So that we would have 200 kicks to judge from instead of 100? Would the fact that we didn't have field position have something to do with the inability to MAINTAIN it? We certainly gained it often enough! As BP said: I would add that our halves are generally unable to redeem most sets of six against the better defensive teams, which is why we find ourselves more often than not on the back foot against the likes of Cowboys or Storm for example. Our halves definitely do thrive with the ad-lib footy we were allowed to play, which would otherwise be very "un-Bennett" like. Problem is that the better teams can generally contain that ad-lib footy, even if we do score an occasional pearler against them. But often it's not enough, and we don't have someone capable of an alternate tactic, like building pressure, against them. Imagine if we did... [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)