Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="heartly87, post: 3152597, member: 8651"] I disagree, what we are failing to see is that it was a loan. Something we are not use to seeing in the NRL but is common in other codes. The Loan contract would have stipulated that it was potentially for the duration of the remaining contract or if the player does not work out or gets injured the primary contract is reactivated. It freed up cash for a year but did not work out in favor of the Broncos, but it was likely the only way Kahu or the Cowboys would have considered the idea, due to the fact the Kahus primary contract was absolutely stupid in the overs we paid and the Cowboys would have been hesitant to take it up fully with the risks involved regarding Kahus injury history. Its not Siebs fault that the original contract was paying Kahu something close to 600k. A price tag he would not have been offered or given at any other club. He is 300-350k max in my opinion based on his extensive time on the sideline and lack of speed for a high end winger. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 66 (members: 0, guests: 66)