Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Brent81, post: 2633569, member: 8195"] Ok. Two things. First, Webcke was not smaller than Merrin. I've already posted Merrin's stats. Webcke was [TABLE="class: infobox vcard, width: 25"] [TR] [TD][B] Height[/B][/TD] [TD="colspan: 6"]183 cm (6 ft 0 in)[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD][B]Weight[/B][/TD] [TD="colspan: 6"]112 kg (17 st 9 lb)[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] AS such Webcke was taller and heavier (by nearly 10 kgs). Second, you reckon we held our own in the forwards against any of those teams. You just don't watch the game do you? Ps - your eckon we "flogged" the Dogs in round one? If one of their blokes hadn't dropped the ball over the line we'd have lost. Against Souths, they were up 16 blot and it should have been 22 blot except for the fact that one of the Burgess dropped the ball as he was going over the line. Ps In that game do you remember one of the Burgess boys scoring off the tap? You can't have your own set of facts Mitch222 [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)