Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Sproj, post: 3455740, member: 8423"] So put aside your feelings about [USER=1769]@Foordy[/USER] or a minute here and look at the points in question that’s being discussed. 1. You can see that a reporter talking about us losing Herbie to another club because he can earn more money and/or play fullback is a legitimate concern and we all are either likely concerned this could happen or is likely to happen - No problem here, reporting of likely facts - good journalism 2. The Roosters are interested in Herbie - in isolation, could be fact as most if not all clubs would be interested in Herbie - not necessarily great journalism but no argument here 3. The Roosters have well reported salary cap issues and currently have three international fullbacks - not reported but these are important facts Now here’s the issue. Points 1 and 2 are linked in the SAME article which, in the absence of point 3, would be fine. Even an article about just point 2 with the Roosters being interested in Herbie in the absence of point 1 and 3, while laughable for other reasons, is fine and would result in ridicule of the Roosters, not Crawley. However point 3 is a HUGE caveat that is ignored here. Ergo, in linking points 1 and 2 together and in the knowledge of point 3 as a very important ignored point, you can surely understand why Crawley would cop it for this very contradictory link between Herbie’s reasons for apparently potentially leaving and why the Roosters being interested is misleading and contradictory right? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 33 (members: 0, guests: 33)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now