Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 3467956, member: 9052"] It's not a restriction of trade because he signed a contract based on his perceived value for his services. If it was deemed a restriction of trade then Haas could say "I'm underpaid because I'm worth a million and this club wants to pay me that so you keeping me to my current contract is a restriction of trade" But that's not how it works. Even outside league if a contractor says "I signed a contract for a going rate of $X, but I've realised I undersold myself so I want my rate bumped up"... the hiring company is gonna be like... "yeah good for you, but we ain't budging on the rate because you already signed the contract." Karl is under contract... only way out is mutual decision to terminate, because Broncos didnt do anything wrong to trigger a termination.. which was his initial claim. He's effectively been granted a "conditional release" with the condition being "Not the Dolphins" and the other club has to pay a transfer fee. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 186 (members: 0, guests: 186)