Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lockysillegitimatechild, post: 3590162, member: 8814"] It was actually as much a criticism on the salary cap as it was the media's inability to investigate and provide new and informative articles to read but, seen as you ask... I would find something with substance to report on. But I do concede the journos in this country are just trying to keep their jobs by meeting certain KPIs and are more a victim of their environment rather then being bad journos in and of itself (eg like how rats caused the black death/plague). So from a more global point of view... Firstly, I think the worst thing the nrl has done in recent years is get rid of/hugely decrease their digital media. It not only gave quality content, but it gave content that wasn't fear mongering to get clicks. This also led to improved content externally as the public had higher expectations. From a general media point of view I'd hope there is one day some competition for Rupert (before he sadly passes), which can be helped along by improved internet for streaming, and dozens of other dodgy decisions getting reversed by the government that helped Rupert monopolies the media market in this country. Advertisers should also realise that whilst sensationalism bs does get clicks, I'd say it is highly likely more than 90% of people click out of it once they read the 1st few lines and realise that is exactly what it is, meaning they don't actually see or read most of the advertisements. In conclusion, the journalists are doing a great job in doing what they are meant to do, it's just that what they're meant to do has nothing to do with being a quality journalist. Investigate, report, minimise bias. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 263 (members: 0, guests: 263)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now