Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 3687228, member: 9052"] I think you're probably heading along the right line of thinking... however I don't really understand where it's come from at all. My only thought is that the $100k you identify gets added to the cap for 2027?? so you might be able to offset a payment from the last year because you're giving them a job the following year... but it really doesn't make sense, because this is something they used to crackdown on. Tigers got in big trouble when a post-footy job was included in Farah's contract... and then Bunnies also had to include GI's wage in their cap after he was employed by the Bunnies the year after he retired... so it's weird that this rule has suddenly appeared out of nowhere, unless it's something that the RLPA pushed for to improve careers for players after footy. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 12 (members: 0, guests: 12)