Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BooKhaki, post: 3323251, member: 11709"] A lot of good points, although those points are cheapened by the fact half the season has been in SEQ, and most likely next year will be too. You are also saying we don't know why things happened, then also claiming it's cheap a cheap buy. What is cheap? Was his salary made public? If it's a minimum wage signing, then I have no major issues, other than I don't really see him playing much NRL with a full strength side, and that spot could be used for a young player. You're also saying he would have learned from the Raiders, but the only year he spent with them, they missed the finals when they were expected to compete for the premiership, and the club was a shamble. We also have 2 blokes coming from top 4 sides with lots of experience, which again lessens the requirement for a bloke like James. If we have paid anything over 200k, I think it's a waste of money. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 264 (members: 0, guests: 264)