Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Professor47, post: 2212125, member: 1831"] It's Stagg that is surprisig the most. My mate whose a bulldog keeps giving me shite about it. He actually attacks now?! Ennis is just a gun, I see nothing different. Eastwood is just playing better. He's doing what we wanted him to do at the Broncos. It sucks but maybe he just needed to be somewhere different. Hannant - I reckon his just in form, I can't see too much of a difference except for the passing game. He's obviously been coached a couple of things. It's just the way they play, forward to forward passes. He was still good at the broncs, he used more of a swivel/pirouet sort of move instead with us. He was a big loss but the dogs paid big money for him and good luck to them. From what I know, we wanted to keep Ennis and Hannant but lost out cause the money difference was too big. Fair enough. We didnt want stagg - we were more than happy to see him go. Eastwood is just bad luck, he was meant to go SL anyway. (So he's playing for peanuts at the dogs - good luck to him) All in all I reckon its acceptable except for the loss of Ennis, surely the money difference would have been manageable! [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 63 (members: 0, guests: 63)