Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lockysillegitimatechild, post: 3351815, member: 8814"] I don't get the Gamble hate on here. Yes he was an organising half yesterday and yes the opposition was not great, but you can only play what is in front of you. We needed an organising and dominant half bcos no one else could and would take that role, yet it shows he isn't what we need? When he was on he also looked the most likely in my eyes. We know he isn't classy, but the same things we liked last year were all there again yesterday. He's up in the opposition's face in attack and defence, he is great defensively, he's high energy, he's competitive, he keeps trying and persisting, he yells orders, he doesn't dwell on errors. Is he right for Reynolds? Maybe not, but he at least deserves a fair crack. The other options are good but definitely not good enough to make him surrender his opportunity when he's done ZERO wrong [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)