Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Renegade, post: 2343108, member: 1928"] The point I was trying to make, perhaps I wasn't overly clear, was that we would've signed a gamebreaker, had we signed Inglis. We had 3 of them last year. Lockyer, Hodges and Falou. Falou is gone, Hodges is an unknown with his injury, and then there's Lockyer. So now we have 1. Maybe 2. Had we have signed Inglis, we would've potentially had 3, there would then be less pressure on the kids to come in and act like the game is solely decided on what they do. But by saying, it's ok, we don't need Inglis, we got kids, then you do. And you know what, some of them might surprise us, but it's still worrysome going into a season relying solely on kids. (If you take Hodges and Lockyer out, who do you have? Bunch of kids) [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 91 (members: 0, guests: 91)